{"id":265,"date":"2019-08-28T08:48:44","date_gmt":"2019-08-28T08:48:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/robdix.com\/?p=265"},"modified":"2020-04-21T15:27:26","modified_gmt":"2020-04-21T15:27:26","slug":"strategic-laziness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/robdix.com\/strategic-laziness\/","title":{"rendered":"Strategic laziness: Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
I probably shouldn’t admit this, but I manage to avoid all manner of relatively unimportant things by just ignoring them the first time<\/strong> around<\/strong>. My theory is that if it does turn out to be that <\/em>important, it’ll find its way back to me again. <\/p>\n\n\n\n So far, this has had no negative consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A good “training wheels” equivalent is to leave it for a while, then check if it’s still relevant.<\/strong> A good rule of thumb is to wait is double the amount of time you might normally be expected to deal with it within<\/em> \u2013 so maybe a couple of weeks for an email, or a couple of months for a letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I’ll often wait, follow up, and get a “never mind, I sorted it” response. Just yesterday, I replied \u2013 two months later \u2013 to a company that said I owed them \u00a36 for some reason I wasn’t clear on. They replied to say I now didn’t owe them anything and they’d done whatever they needed to do. Go figure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Does this sound lazy? Selfish? Disorganised? Irresponsible? Maybe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But it’s part of what I call “strategic laziness”: doing as little as possible of what doesn’t<\/em> matter, to free up time for what does<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Save time and energy by ignoring your responsibilities. Strategically, of course.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n